Corrective Action Deadlines Under the 2022 CGP: Immediate, Next Business Day, or 7 Days
The CGP sets a fix deadline and a separate 24-hour documentation deadline for every corrective action. Most operators only track the first one.

A corrective action is not one deadline, it is at least two running side by side. EPA's 2022 Construction General Permit sets a fix deadline, immediate, next business day, or seven calendar days depending on what broke, and a separate 24-hour deadline for writing it down. Most operators track the first and lose track of the second, and an inspector reading a corrective action log for gaps does not care that the control got fixed on time. This post works through Part 5 of the permit: what triggers the requirement, the three-tier fix deadline, the documentation clock that runs alongside it, and what happens when EPA orders a fix directly.
What actually triggers a corrective action
Parts 5.1.1 through 5.1.5 list the conditions that start the clock. None of them require a formal notice from anyone; the obligation exists the moment the condition exists, whether or not you have written it down yet.
- A stormwater control needs a significant repair, or a new or replacement control is needed, or, per Part 2.1.4c, you find yourself doing the same routine maintenance fix on the same control at the same location three or more times.
- A control the permit required was never installed, or was installed incorrectly.
- Your discharges are not meeting applicable water quality standards.
- A prohibited discharge has occurred, as described in Part 1.3.
- During site dewatering, your weekly average turbidity result exceeds the 50 NTU benchmark, or you observe or are told about the conditions in Part 4.6.3e.
Most of these get found on an inspection, not because someone went looking for them independently. If you want the other half of this picture, how often you have to inspect a site covers the schedule that surfaces these conditions in the first place; the two requirements are meant to work together, not separately.
Three fix deadlines, not one
Once a trigger condition exists, Part 5.2.1 of the permit text sets out what you owe and by when, and it is not a single number. The first step applies no matter what tripped the requirement. The second and third steps depend on the size of the problem.
| Step | Deadline | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate response, every trigger | Right away: take all reasonable steps to address the condition, including cleaning up contaminated surfaces before the next storm | Part 5.2.1a |
| Minor fix: no new or replacement control, no significant repair | Completed by the close of the next business day | Part 5.2.1b |
| Major fix: new/replacement control or significant repair required | Installed and operational, or repaired, within 7 calendar days of discovery | Part 5.2.1c |
| SWPPP update, if the fix changed a control or procedure | Within 7 calendar days of completing the work | Part 5.2.1c |
| Document the condition | Within 24 hours of identifying it | Part 5.4.1a |
| Document the fix | Within 24 hours of completing it | Part 5.4.1b |
The distinction between the minor and major rows is not a severity score you get to assign after the fact; it turns on whether the fix needs a new or replacement control or a significant repair, which is a question about the work itself. A clogged silt fence you can clear by hand is a next-business-day fix. A silt fence that washed out and needs re-trenching and re-staking is a seven-day fix, because that is a repair, not a clean-up.
Seven calendar days is not always enough, and the permit accounts for that rather than pretending otherwise. If it is infeasible to finish the installation or repair within seven days, Part 5.2.1c requires you to document why it is infeasible and document your schedule for finishing the work as soon as feasible afterward. That is a genuine escape valve, but it only works if you use it before the seventh day passes, not after an inspector asks why a control has been broken for three weeks.
Dewatering discharges get their own path under Part 5.2.2, because shutting off a discharge outright is sometimes the safer immediate move: take all reasonable steps to minimise or prevent the discharge, including shutting off the dewatering flow depending on the severity of the condition, then work out whether the controls are operating effectively and make the adjustments needed to bring turbidity back under the benchmark. Discharge can resume once those steps are complete and any necessary changes are made: there is no separate seven-day clock bolted onto that sequence.
The clock nobody watches
Here is the part of Part 5 that gets skipped: the documentation deadlines in Part 5.4 are not the same deadline as the fix deadline, restated. They are a second, independent obligation that runs from different starting points. Within 24 hours of identifying a corrective action condition, Part 5.4.1a requires you to document the specific condition and the date and time you identified it. Within 24 hours of completing the corrective action, Part 5.4.1b requires you to document the actions taken and whether the SWPPP needed updating. Fix a control inside its seven-day window and still miss either 24-hour entry, and the log has a gap regardless of how promptly the repair itself happened.
Two more requirements sit on top of the entries themselves. Part 5.4.2 requires each log entry to be signed by the operator's signatory, under the same authority described in Appendix G, Part G.11.2. And Part 5.4.3 requires you to keep a copy of the corrective action log at the site or somewhere easily accessible, so it can be produced immediately during an on-site inspection or on request: not retrieved from a filing cabinet at head office three days later.
Basinwise's retained corrective action log seeds each entry's due date from Part 5.2.1b or 5.2.1c rather than asking you to type one in, and stores the permit citation alongside the date so the record still explains itself years later. If you override the date, because you know something we don't, a documented infeasibility, a public holiday, the override is recorded next to the permit default rather than replacing it. It does not watch the 24-hour documentation clock for you; that part is still on you to run at the moment you identify and close each condition.
When EPA orders it directly
Everything above describes conditions you find yourself. Part 5.3 adds a separate route: you must comply with any corrective action EPA requires as a result of permit violations found during an inspection carried out under Part 4.8. That inspection is EPA's own compliance inspection, distinct from the routine site inspections you conduct yourself, and a corrective action ordered this way is not optional or up for negotiation the way a self-identified fix's exact deadline sometimes is. EPA's own CGP frequently asked questions page covers how these compliance inspections relate to the permit more broadly. Being ordered this way is also one of the paths that can accelerate your final stabilisation schedule: EPA can shorten stabilisation timing where sediment discharge and the corrective actions required under Part 5.3 make a faster schedule necessary.
You must comply with any corrective actions required by EPA as a result of permit violations found during an inspection carried out under Part 4.8.
The practical takeaway is the same either way: the log you keep under Part 5.4 is the record that shows which route a given entry came from, self-identified or EPA-ordered, and when each clock started and closed. And once logged, how long you must keep the corrective action log is a separate three-year question with its own starting point, not the end of the story.
See the corrective-action deadline that applies to your site, with the permit section behind it.
Screen a site freeFAQ
What counts as a "significant repair" rather than a minor fix?
The permit does not set a numeric threshold. The test in Part 5.2.1 is whether the problem needs a new or replacement control or a significant repair; if it does, you're on the seven-day track, not the next-business-day one. Judgement calls should be documented with the reasoning, because the classification is what sets your deadline.
What if I can't finish a major repair within seven calendar days?
Part 5.2.1c has an infeasibility path: document why the repair can't be finished in seven days, and document your schedule for finishing it as soon as feasible afterward. Write that down before day seven passes, not after.
Does fixing the problem on time satisfy the permit by itself?
No. Parts 5.4.1a and 5.4.1b set separate 24-hour deadlines for documenting the identification and the completion of the fix. A repair finished inside its deadline with no log entry, or a late log entry, is still a gap in the corrective action log.
Who has to sign each corrective action log entry?
The operator's signatory, per Part 5.4.2, under the same signatory authority described in Appendix G, Part G.11.2 of the permit.
Can EPA require a corrective action even if I didn't identify a trigger myself?
Yes. Part 5.3 requires you to comply with any corrective action EPA orders as a result of violations found during its own compliance inspection under Part 4.8, independent of the triggers you identify on your own routine inspections.
This guide is general compliance guidance, not legal or engineering advice, and it is not a permit. To see what applies to your own site, use the free screening, or see how the same engine works from your own code or an AI agent.
More guides
Put this into practice on your own site
Screen a site free in your browser, or read the permit that governs your state.